Tips
The following modifications to the Laws and Regulations will apply in any Auckland Bridge Club event held online for UNDOs. They deal with how the director should try to assess whether an UNDO should be granted to correct a possible misclick.
The details below are as specific as possible, but two simple pieces of advice for players encountering this situation are:
Law 25A
(i) A change of call will be permitted via “Undo” for a misclick where the Director is satisfied that the original call made was unintended.
(ii) A call may be changed under (i) provided partner has not subsequently called.
(iii) In the case of an unintended call by either of the last two players to call in the auction, the call may be changed under (i) provided the opening lead has not been made.
(iv) When a board has been passed in and the Director is satisfied that a pass made by the third or fourth player to call was unintended, the Director may award an artificial adjusted score under the provisions of Law 12C2, treating both sides as non-offending. Law 86B may be applicable.
Law 45C4b
This Law specifically mentions playing from dummy, but it was written for the 2017 rules. These rules will modify it for online play to include cards played from declarer’s or defender’s hands as well as those played from dummy.
i) A change of a played card will be permitted via “Undo” for a misclick where the Director is satisfied that the original card played was unintended.
ii) A play may be changed under (i) provided partner has not subsequently played.
Principles for allowing or not allowing unintended calls or plays:
Unless the player is able to convince the Director otherwise, a call made or card played will be assumed to be intended. In particular, the following instances should be treated as prima facie evidence that the action taken was not unintended:
(i) The call or card which the player wishes to substitute is not immediately adjacent to the call or card originally clicked;
(ii) The call or card which was originally clicked is a potential logical action given the preceding bidding or play;
(iii) The call or card which was originally clicked is consistent with a careless play or a failure to give full attention to previous actions in the bidding or play.
Some explanatory examples follow:
W N E S
P 1⋄ 3♠ 3NT
P 4♣ P 4NT
P
At this point, while North is thinking, South requests an UNDO and tells the Director that they intended to bid 6♣. No change should be allowed.
W N E S
P 1♥ P 2♥
X P P
At this point, East requests an UNDO. East’s pass is consistent with them not noticing West’s double. No change should be allowed.
W N E S
P 1♥
P 1♠ P 2NT
P 3NT P P
P
North
Q543
65
AQJT8
86
East
T9762
K74
K72
J5
Trick 1: ♣3-♣6-♣J-♣Q
Trick 2: ⋄3-⋄6-⋄Q-⋄x
East requests an UNDO.
Whether East plays either the 7 or the 2 of diamonds no change should be allowed.
If they had played the 2⋄ then the fact that it was not the adjacent card would be a contributing factor. Even if it was the 7⋄ no change should be allowed because holding up the diamond to stop declarer using the suit would be a potential logical action. It doesn’t necessarily work well if declarer switches to play on hearts.